|
The Israel Koschitzky Virtual Beit
Midrash
Introduction to Parashat Hashavua Yeshivat Har Etzion
Dedicated in loving memory
of Shmuel Nachamu ben Shlomo Moshe HaKohen (whose yahrtzeit falls on 10
Tevet), Chaya bat Yitzchak Dovid (whose yahrtzeit falls on 15 Tevet), and
Shimon ben Moshe (whose yahrtzeit falls on 16 Tevet).
Three Plagues of Darkness
By Rabbi Yaakov Beasley
A.
INTRODUCTION The Anomalies of the
Beginning
Our
parasha begins, apparently, where last week's ended. Despite the effects of yet another
devastating plague, Pharoah refuses to release the Jewish people from their
bondage. Again, God charges Moshe
with appearing before Pharaoh.
Already, we know in advance that Pharaoh will refuse to listen. We wonder: is there any significance our
parasha beginning with plague #8 (locusts)[1]?
Could not our reading have just as easily begun with plague #6 (boils) or #7
(hail) from last week; or with the next plague, darkness, instead[2]?
Our parasha's beginning might assist us in locating how the plague
of locusts differs from its predecessors:
1 And Hashem said
unto Moshe: 'Come in unto Pharaoh; for I have hardened his heart, and the heart
of his servants, so that I might show these My signs in the midst of them; 2 and so that you may tell in the ears of your son, and of
your son's son, what I wrought upon Egypt, and My signs which I toyed with them;
and you will know that I am Hashem.' 3 And Moshe and Aaron
went in unto Pharaoh, and said unto him: 'Thus says Hashem, the God of the
Hebrews: How long will you refuse to humble yourself before Me? let My people
go, that they may serve Me. 4 Else, if you refuse to let My
people go, behold, tomorrow will I bring locusts into your border; 5 and they shall cover the face of the earth, that one shall
not be able to see the earth; and they shall eat the residue of that which is
escaped, which remains for you from the hail, and shall eat every tree which
grows for you out of the field; 6 and your houses shall be
filled, and the houses of all your servants, and the houses of all the
Egyptians; as neither your fathers nor your fathers' fathers have seen, since
the day that they were upon the earth unto this day.' And he turned, and went
out from Pharaoh.
7 And Pharaoh's
servants said unto him: 'How long shall this man be a snare unto us? let the men
go, that they may serve Hashem their God, do you not see that Egypt is
destroyed?' 8 And Moshe and Aaron were brought again unto
Pharaoh; and he said unto them: 'Go, serve Hashem your God; but who are they
that shall go?' 9 And Moshe said: 'We will go with our
young and with our old, with our sons and with our daughters, with our flocks
and with our herds we will go; for we must hold a feast unto Hashem.' 10 And he said unto them: 'So be Hashem with you, as I will
let you go, and your little ones; see you that evil is before your face. 11 Not so; go now you that are men, and serve Hashem; for
that is what you desire.' And they were driven out from Pharaoh's presence.
The first anomaly that distinguishes this plague from the previous
plagues in its opening command, "Come in to Pharaoh." While this command has appeared
previously (6:11, 7:6, 9:1), it always was accompanied with further instructions
to announce the onset of the upcoming plague, or to perform some action in
Pharaoh's presence. While some
commentators suggest that Moshe was feeling either hesitant or frustrated, the
text provides no hint of this on Moshe's part. The Ramban wrestles with the fact that
what Moshe is to say to Pharaoh is missing, and suggests that this is the Torah's manner in relating
information since we hear what Moshe said to Pharaoh, we can deduce what
Hashem commanded Moshe, and relating that information would have been
unnecessary. However, the Ramban's
argument only highlights the discrepancy with previous plagues, where the
commands were given in full, and their fulfillments shortened. Why does the Torah here begin the
command, only to abruptly stop?[3]
We also note
the unexpected criticism that emanates from Pharaoh's advisors. While the Torah already recorded that
"those who feared Hashem" protected their property during the plague of hail, we
have not yet witnessed a public break between Pharaoh and his advisors. Until now, Pharaoh's control over them
has appeared absolute. Suddenly, we
find them berating Pharaoh publicly; a noted humiliation for the previously
unquestioned despot[4]. Several commentators explain Moshe's
hasty exit from the Divine court in verse 6 and their reentry in verse 8 as an
attempt to allow them one final attempt to persuade Pharoah to concede:
"And
why [did Moshe and Aharon leave uninvited]? They saw them [the advisors] turning to
each other is discomfort, for they believed Moshe's words. Therefore, they left suddenly, so that
the advisors could convince Pharaoh to repent." (Shemot Rabba 13:4, Ramban,
Kli Yakar)
While their
efforts were tragically unsuccessful, the division between monarch and subjects
was now public.
Finally, we note that the object of the Divine command to Moshe has
changed. Until now, Moshe's primary
purpose was to convince Pharoah to release the people. Each visit was a sincere attempt to
demonstrate to Pharaoh the error of his ways. No longer. Pharaoh's heart has been forever
hardened, his fate irrevocably sealed[5]. Now, Hashem directs His attention to the
soon to be freed Jewish people.
The Torah states that Moshe should come to Pharaoh "so that I might show
these My signs in the midst of them; and so that you may tell in the ears of
your son, and of your son's son, what I wrought upon Egypt, and My signs
which I have done among them; and you will know that I am Hashem." From here until the final exodus, all
that occurs is to impress the Jewish people for eternity.
B.
The Abrabanel's
Connection
The
Abrabanel begins his commentary on our parasha with our question: What
makes the plague of locusts so significant that it deserves to begin a separate
parasha? He suggests that
the last three plagues are so ominous that as opposed to until now, when Pharaoh
and his servants only experienced a sense of panic once the plague had occurred,
now they feel terror even before the plague's onset. Therefore, for the first time, Pharaoh
is willing to negotiate the conditions of the departure of the Jewish
people. He then suggests a second reason for
linking the final three plagues together:
And the
second reason is that the plague of locusts, the plague of darkness, and the
plague of the killing of the firstborn all come from the air; and all darkness
the earth. By the plague of
locusts, it states, "And the locusts went up over all the land of Egypt, and
rested in all the borders of Egypt; very grievous were they; before them there
were no such locusts as they, neither after them shall be such. For they covered the
face of the whole earth, so that the land was darkened." By the plague of darkness, it states,
"And there was darkness over all the land of Egypt." By the plague of the first-born, it
states, "It was in the middle of the night" "He placed them in darkness, like
the eternally dead (paraphrasing Eikha 3:6)." For this reason, the Torah grouped the
last three parashiyot together in a separate parasha.
While the
Abrabanel's connection is interesting, it appears superficial to our story. What significance does the
lighting/timing of the plague have to its effect? We noted above that one of the
outcomes of the plague of locusts was to isolate Pharaoh from his advisors. A rereading of Hashem's opening command
to Moshe, "Come in to Pharaoh" reinforces this effect. Two antagonists confront each other -
Moshe, Hashem's humble servant, and Pharaoh, ruler and deity over Egypt. Their final clashes are dramatic after
the plague of darkness Pharaoh threatens Moshe with death should he appear again
before him; while after the death of Egypt's firstborn, the Midrash reduces
Pharaoh to aimlessly wandering the streets of Goshen, calling out Moshe's name,
while the delighted slaves mock him and provide him with incorrect
directions. All this, states the
Torah, so that Hashem can "execute judgment against all of the gods of Egypt"
(12:12). To the Egyptians, their
king was a living deity. His patron
among the Egyptian pantheon was the most central god Ra - the sun god, who
created the world and rode the sun-chariot daily across the sky. Suddenly, the Torah's emphasis on
darkness attains greater significance.
For the first seven plagues, while Pharaoh ostensibly maintained free
will and could still choose to release the Jewish people, both Moshe and Hashem
treat him with respect. From here
onwards, they dedicate themselves to his ruin. As the light of his patron god
disappears, so too do Pharaoh's remaining vestiges of power. It is no wonder then that the
traditional parasha division chooses the plague of locusts to begin this
new stage of redemption. A stage where redemption takes second to triumph and
Egyptian acknowledgment of God's sovereignty takes a back seat to the
transmission of national pride to future generations of Jewish pride.
C.
Returning to Darkness, Restoring
Light
Chassidic
thought explains the significance of the darkness differently. The beginning of the Torah describes how
God's first creative act was to bring light into the world. Until now, the sun and the moon gave
light regularly, according to the Divine command. Suddenly, G-d overturns nature
itself to punish the Egyptians.
Indeed, the plagues represent nothing less than the dismantling of
creation itself:
For in
six days the Lord made heaven and earth" (Shemot 31:17). Were they
created in six days? Surely, it was already stated: "By the word of the Lord
were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of His mouth"
(Tehillim 33:6). Rather, to exact punishment from the wicked who destroy
the world that was created in six days, and to give good reward to the righteous
who maintain the world that was created in six days. (Pesikta Rabbati
23)
My
master and grandfather, of blessed memory would say that the ten plagues
correspond to the ten ma'amarot (verbal act of creation), and through
that, they later became the ten dibrot. For it is stated that the world
was created with ten ma'amarot. What does the verse teach
in order to
exact punishment from the wicked and give reward to the righteous. Certainly to
exact punishment from the wicked refers to Pharaoh, as it is written: "And I and
my nations are wicked." And to give reward to the righteous this refers to the
Torah that is called good, because it was given to the people of Israel.
(Sefat Emet, Vaera, 1835)
Many
commentators attempt to align each of the ten plagues with a corresponding
ma'amar (i.e. see the Maharal of Prague's alignment in Gevurat Hashem,
ch. 57). The common thread among
their approaches is that just as the Torah began with God's creation of the
universe and the division of the world into clear, identifiable categories,
(light vs. dark, water vs. land, different beings according to each one's kind
and place); the plagues represent more than just the destruction of Egypt's
resources, but the very unraveling of the tapestry of creation. All previous known boundaries disappear
- frogs and wild animals roam the land, water becomes blood, and the sky rains
fire. As day becomes darkness, we
sense that the very light that began creation has slipped away. At the end, only Hashem himself
remains. With this approach, the
Exodus has become something more than the release of a people from bondage. As the Jews leave Egypt, we sense that
even creation itself is restarting.
How the Jewish people take advantage of this opportunity becomes the rest
of the story.
[1] As to the
history of the division of the Torah's text into parashiyot, we know that
the public reading of the Torah began with the return to Eretz Yisrael after the
Babylonian exile (see Nechemya 8).
However, the annual reading cycle as practiced by the Jewish exile
community in Babylonia was different from the custom of the remaining Jews of
Palestine. The Babylonian Talmud makes one oblique reference to the triennial
cycle: 'The people of the west (i.e. the Jews of Eretz Yisrael) who complete
[the reading] (sic.) of the Torah in three years.' Ultimately, the custom to
read the entire Torah in one year prevailed. While Benjamin of Tudela mentioned
Egyptian congregations that took three years to read the Torah as late as 1170,
Maimonides could safely observe in the Mishneh Torah that, "the widespread
practice in all of Israel is to complete the Torah in one year. There are some
who complete the Torah in three years, but this is not a widespread practice."
The division of parashiyot found
in the modern-day Torah scrolls of all Ashkenazic, Sephardic, and Yemenite communities is based upon the systematic list
provided by Maimonides in Mishneh Torah, Laws of Tefillin, Mezuza and
Torah Scrolls, Chapter 8. Maimonides based his division of the parashiyot
for the Torah on the Masoretic text of the Aleppo Codex. Though initially doubted by Umberto Cassuto, this has become the established position in
modern scholarship.
[2] My first Tanach teacher at Yeshiva University, Rabbi Benjamin Blech,
would strengthen the question as follows: We know that according to the Haggada,
after the recital of the Ten Plagues, we recite Rabbi Yehuda's acronym for the
plagues DTz"Ch, AD"Sh, BACh"B, which divides the plagues
into three groups of 3 followed by the final blow, the killing of the
firstborn. Many commentators point
out the thematic and literary links that justify this division. Between boils and hail would have been
the ideal place to conclude the previous parasha. Why did those who established the
parasha divisions choose to violate this tradition?
[3] Rabbi Ezra Bick develops this thinking much further in his article "Bo,"
available in the parasha section in the VBM archives at www.vbm-torah.org.
[4] The Kli Yakar suggests that
this rift between Pharaoh and his people answers our original question: What
makes the plague of locusts so significant that it deserves to begin a separate
parasha?
[5] A fact poignantly described in the text through Pharaoh's courtiers, who
plead with him to release the Jewish people before everything is lost, to no
avail.
|