|
The Israel Koschitzky Virtual Beit Midrash
Parshat HaShavua
Yeshivat Har Etzion
This parasha
series is dedicated
in memory of Michael Jotkowitz, z"l.
********************************************************
This shiur is
dedicated in memory of Hillel ben Yechiel
Reiter z"l,
whose
Yahrzeit will be observed on the 24th of Kislev. May his soul be among the Righteous in Gan Eden.
*********************************************************
This shiur is dedicated in memory of Israel Koschitzky
zt"l, whose yahrzeit
falls on the 19th of Kislev.
May the
world-wide dissemination of Torah through the VBM be a fitting tribute to a man
whose lifetime achievements exemplified the love of Eretz Yisrael and Torat Yisrael.
*********************************************************
PARASHAT
VAYESHEV [1]
THE STORY OF
JOSEPH
By Rav Tamir Granot
I. Introduction
The center of our parasha is, of course, the story of Yosef. On the
literary level, the story of Yosef occupies at least
three parshiyot, with its embroilments
ultimately finding their solution only when Yosef
reveals his identity to his brothers in Parashat
Vayigash.
The division of the parshiyot also
takes into account considerations of reasonable length: after all, the parasha needs to be read publicly in the synagogue,
and therefore the division comes at the expense of literary considerations.
From an exegetical perspective, the
entire story may be regarded as a single, lengthy unit. The most prominent motif running throughout
the story of Yosef is dreams.
There are
three pairs of dreams:
·
Yosef's dreams
·
The dreams of Pharoah's
ministers
·
Pharoah's dreams
There can be
no doubt that in order to understand the full significance of the story of Yosef, we must understand the function of the dreams in the
story. We refer here not just to the
interpretation of each individual dream, but to the very view of the dream as a
central factor in the development of the events, and the fact that the Torah
chooses to recount the events through the prism of dreams.
There is no other narrative in Tanakh in which dreams play such a critical role,
and therefore attention should be paid to the special aspects of this specific
narrative.
II. The relationship between the three pairs
of dreams
Before addressing this issue, let us
first review several facts pertaining to the dreams:
·
All of the dreams in the story are realized
almost in full. Working backwards from
the end of the story, Pharoah dreams are realized in
the form of seven years of plenty and of famine; the dreams of his ministers
are likewise realized, as we read, "And it was, as he interpreted for us
so it was; I was restored to my position and he was hanged." Yosef's dreams,
too, are realized: his brothers and his father bow down to him as master of all
of Egypt.
·
Yosef's dreams serve as a framework for the
other two pairs: the story as a whole is built around his dreams. They are presented at the very outset (Bereishit
37), and it is Yosef's revelation to his brothers and
their recognition of their dependence on him that bring about the realization
of his dreams (especially the second one) and the conclusion of the story. The other pairs of dreams those of the
ministers and those of Pharoah catalyze different
stages of the story by allowing Yosef to reveal his
special wisdom and thereby to attain the status of Pharoah's
second-in-command.
·
Yosef is called "ba'al
ha-chalomot" (the "dreamer," or
literally "master of dreams") the name itself testifying to the
centrality of dreams in his personality.
This title has two different meanings, as we shall see further on. The first is what the brothers mean when they
use it: i.e., that Yosef habitually experiences
dreams and recounts them. The other
meaning is that he knows how to interpret dreams, but this becomes apparent
only later, in Egypt.
We must draw
a distinction between the different pairs of dreams, as follows:
Pharoah dreams: One
interpretation covers both. Each of the
two dreams uses a different set of parallel symbols, but they mean the same
thing.
Yosef's dreams: The general
message of the two dreams is the same i.e., the relationship of submission of
the brothers and even their parents to Yosef. But their historical interpretation is
apparently manifest in two separate events, as the Ramban
explains. The dream of the sheaves
speaks of the brothers' economic dependence on Yosef,
with Yosef represented in the dream like all of his
brothers as a sheaf of corn. In other
words, the characters do not appear "personally" in this dream, but
rather are represented symbolically. The
realization of this dream comes with the arrival of the brothers in Egypt to stand
before the "mashbir" (distributor of
food) who later turns out to be Yosef, but meantime
Yosef hides his identity from his brothers. Their subservience to him at that moment
arises from his economic power, his ability to distribute sheaves; hence, this
represents the realization of his dream of the sheaves. Neither the dream nor the reality feature Yaakov or the matriarchs; this is further proof that this
situation is indeed the fulfillment of the dream.
The dream of the heavenly bodies: After Yosef
reveals his identity to his brothers, their dependence on him is no longer
economic; they are subservient to him as the second-in-command to the king
and also the de facto head of the family. Here Yaakov, Leah
and the handmaids are included in the subservience to Yosef,
and likewise in the dream: "Behold the sun and the moon and eleven stars
prostrated themselves before me" - ME myself, not a symbolic
representation. This may hint at the
appropriate continuation and realization of the dream is that they bow down to
God for the heavenly bodies bow to no-one but God. This may be hinting at the quasi-deific
status of the King of Egypt, which Yosef attains de
facto. While it seems that Yosef himself did not predict this, events ultimately gave
this interpretation to the dream: "Without you [your instruction] no man
shall lift his hand or foot throughout the land of Egypt."
The dreams of the ministers: These, of course, are two
completely separate dreams, presented in symmetrical form. Thus in literary terms the dual structure is
maintained.
(The interesting question of how Yosef
understood what these dreams meant will be discussed in next week's parasha.)
III. The meaning of the
dreams
Let us now return to the fundamental
question that we posed at the outset: what is the role of the dreams in the
story and its message?
If we analyze the dreams within the
framework of the plot, we see that in fact they fulfill three different roles,
on three different levels:
1.
The first has already been discussed: the dreams foretell what will
happen in the future. In fact, in our story,
everything that happens in a general sense is known in advance. Everything is predicted in the dreams. In this sense, the dreams create the
impression of a series of events whose outcome is planned from the outset.
2.
The dreams are a factor in the real development of the plot. The dreams of Yosef
himself and especially the fact that he decides to tell his brothers about
them are the cause of their jealousy and hatred towards him, they are the
reason for him being cast into the pit and eventually being sold in short,
they are the source of all the action.
The dreams of the ministers turn out, after the fact, to be the catalyst
for Yosef's dazzling move from the dungeon to the
king's palace. And Pharoah's
dreams allow Yosef to demonstrate his
psycho-metaphysic capabilities as well as his practical wisdom, leading to his
appointment as the king's second-in-command.
3.
Yosef's dreams are also an important factor on
the level of moral retribution. In other
words, within the framework of the Divinely-ordained rules of sin and
punishment, the dreams are an act of arrogance and provocation, and Yosef is punished accordingly measure for measure. Attention should be paid to the perfect
structure of the story. Twice Yosef offended his
brothers and aroused their jealousy by recounting the dreams, in which he
enjoys supreme status over them.
Correspondingly, Yosef is twice cast into a
pit the one in Shekhem, the other the dungeon in Potiphar's house, where he becomes a servant devoid of any
honor; the exact opposite of what he dreamed.
Obviously, this in no way nullifies the veracity of the dreams
themselves, but publicizing them brought about the opposite result, at first,
until Yosef had come to see the error of his ways.
In other words, the use of the dream
as a central motif in the story makes it possible to present via the same
motif the three dimensions in which the story takes place:
1.
The first dimension is the deterministic one, where everything is known
in advance. The significance of this
dimension is that everything that happens is part of the great Divine plan. From a broader perspective it is clear that
the story of Yosef, as a whole, is a realization of
the prophecy of the Covenant Between the Parts, in
which Avraham is told, "Your descendants will be strangers in a land that
is not theirs." It is through the
story of Yosef that this difficult situation comes
about. None of the characters neither Yosef, nor his brothers, nor even Yaakov
is aware that they are all actors in a great plan, but there can be no doubt
that to us (familiar as we are with Sefer Bereishit all the way to its conclusion) this is
clear. The dreams show, as we have said,
that this is more than just a series of causes and effects; rather, the end is
determined in advance. Yosef himself tells his brothers, near the end of the
story: "For God sent me before you to preserve life, to make for you a
remnant in the land and to save your lives by a great deliverance." He understands that he is an instrument in
the hands of Divine Providence, to fulfill its plans.
2.
The second dimension is the real one for the events certainly have
this aspect too. One event follows the
next; choice after choice is made.
People bring their fate upon themselves.
Foolishness and pretentiousness at the start which are transformed, in
Yosef's case, into wisdom and humility at the end,
are the source for understanding everything that has happened between himself
and his brothers.
3.
The third level is that of Divine moral causality. Yosef sins;
therefore he must be punished. In the
familiar manner of the Torah, the punishment comes to him "on its
own," as it were: "Wisdom was asked: One who sins what is his
punishment? Wisdom answered: Evil pursues sinners." In other words, from
the perspective of the Divine significance of events, too, a distinction must
be made drawn between the level of the Divine plan, fixed in advance, and the
level of sin and punishment, which exists altogether in the present.
The crux of the message of the
story, then as conveyed by the dreams is that these three dimensions, which
theoretically are quite distinct and independent, all in fact coexist within
the same events, with no borders. There
is no better medium than a dream which is also vision, emotion, a riddle for
the wise, as well as a manifestation of personal fantasies to express the
different layers embodied, ultimately, within the very same reality.
The concept of dual sometimes, as
in our case, even triple dimensions within general as well as personal
history, is one of the most important fundamental ideas arising from biblical historiosophy. To a
large extent it is also the basis for our understanding of individual and
national life in general, which are perceived through categories of faith. Hence the importance of the
story of Yosef, and the centrality of the dreams
within it.
IV. The turning point
We noted previously the dual
significance of Yosef being the "master of
dreams." He is on one hand the dreamer; on the other hand the
interpreter of dreams. An examination of
the development of the story reveals that its turning point is the stage where Yosef turns into the "interpreter of dreams," and
thus his status is "upgraded" to the point where ultimately, at the
end of this process, he is appointed second-in-command to the King of
Egypt. The event in which the crux of
this "turning point" takes place is the interpretation of Pharoah's dreams.
Until this point Yosef has not been a
personality who determines his own path and is active within the events;
rather, events have acted upon him. He
is "a dreamer." He is
dispatched by his father, he is cast into a pit, he is sold, he is appointed
head of Potiphar's household, he
is drawn towards sin and then thrown again into a dungeon. It is only when he proposes to Pharoah's ministers that he will interpret their dreams
that the beginning of a change makes itself felt. The dramatic turning point is, obviously,
where he not only responds to Pharoah's demand that
his dreams be explained, but also advises him in a way more appropriate to a
Minister of the Treasury or a Prime Minister what he should do in order to
prepare his country for the years of famine: "Let Pharoah
act to appoint officers over the land
.."
In other words, the transition from
passivity to activity in relation to dreams from "dreamer" to
"interpreter" is likewise reflected in a transition from passivity
to activity in relation to reality from "determined" to
"determiner." Yosef, who has been pushed around at the mercy of his
environment, now becomes its director.
The understanding of this turning
point in Yosef's personality and activity is
important for an understanding of his story as a whole. It also gives rise to several questions:
1.
What is it about Pharoah's dreams or the
context in which they are interpreted that causes this change of heart on the
part of Yosef, who arrives unaided at the
understanding that he must now take the reigns? How does he change his
situation from "fate" to "destiny," using the classic
terminology of Rabbi J. D. Soloveitchik? [2]
2.
How did Yosef act when he understood that he
must guide history rather than being at the mercy of his fate? How did he
understand his destiny?
3.
As to the three levels of significance discussed above the Divine, the
moral, and the real on which of these levels does Yosef's
turning point take place, and what is its significance on each level?
These questions will remain open for
now, since they require in-depth discussion principally in parashat
Miketz. We
shall elaborate on them further next week.
Notes:
[1] This shiur
and the following ones especially Parashat Miketz and Parashat
Vayigash constitute an integral thematic and
exegetical unit. That which is omitted
in one shiur will be made up in another.
[2] See his
article "Kol Dodi
Dofek."
Translated by
Kaeren Fish
|