|
The Israel Koschitzky Virtual Beit
Midrash
The Book of Shmuel Yeshivat Har Etzion
Lecture
25: ChapterS 13-14
THE
FIRST WAR AGAINST THE PELISHTIM (PART Iv)
Rav
Amnon Bazak
XII. THE COMPARISON BETWEEN
SHAUL AND GIDON
In the previous lesson we noted the striking contrast between Shaul's
passive inaction and his failure even to inquire of God, and Yehonatan's active
efforts and successful combination of deep faith in God and military capability
that allows him to bring the war against the Pelishtim to a favorable
conclusion. Interestingly, Scripture expresses the wide gap between Shaul and
Yehonatan by way of one of the most instructive parallels in the book of
Shmuel, that between the figure of Gidon the Shofet and the
figures of Shaul and Yehonatan. This parallelism stretches over several chapters
in the book (9-14), and reaches its climax in the account of the war against the
Pelishtim. Following this parallelism and the surprising twist that it receives
will add an important dimension to our understanding of the narrative and its
message.
The first points of parallelism appear already at the beginning of
Shaul's career:
1)
Both figures are called already at our first encounter with them "a
mighty man of valor" (Shoftim 6:12; I Shmuel
9:1).
2)
When they are informed of the role for which they have been designated,
they both express their opposition, for reasons of modesty, with similar
arguments (as was noted in chapter 9):
And
he said to him, O my Lord, with what shall I save Israel? Behold, my family is
the poorest in Menasheh, and I am the youngest in my father's house.
(Shoftim 6:15)
And
Shaul answered and said, Am I not a Binyamini, of the smallest of the tribes of
Israel? And my family the least of all the families of the tribe of Binyamin?
Why then do you speak so to me? (I Shmuel 9:21)
3)
Both figures are promised that God will be with
them:
And
the Lord said to him, Surely I will be with You. (Shoftim
6:16)
That
you do as occasion serve you; for God is with you. (I Shmuel
10:7)
4)
Both Shmuel and Gidon are given signs that strengthen their faith in
their appointment:
Gidon
asks the angel: "If now I have found favor in your sight, then show me a sign
that it is You who talks with me" (Shoftim 6:17);
Shmuel says to Shaul: "And let it be, when these signs are come to you, that you
do as occasion serve you; for God is with you" (I Shmuel
10:7).
At
this stage, the parallelism inclines toward Shaul's favor, for he is given signs
even without asking for them, whereas Gidon had to ask for
signs.
I
will later point to additional parallels between Shaul and Gidon,
but at this stage let us move on to the main parallel – in the account of the
war against the Pelishtim in chapters 13-14.
XIII. THE COMPARISON BETWEEN THE
WAR AGAINST THE PELISHIM AND THE WAR AGAINST MIDYAN
Scripture draws a broad parallel between Shaul's war against the
Pelishtim and Gidon's war against Midyan:
1)
In both accounts, the enemy is described as enormous in
number:
Now
Midyan and Amalek and all the children of the east lay along in the valley like
locusts for multitude; and their camels were without number, as the sand by
the seashore for multitude. (Shoftim 7:12)
And
the Pelishtim gathered themselves together to fight with Israel, thirty thousand
chariots, and six thousand horsemen, and people like the sand on the seashore
for multitude. (I Shmuel 13:5)
The people of Israel, in contrast, pass through a sifting process, until
only a small number of fighters are left. In the war against Midyan the main
message is that the war is God's, and therefore there is an explicit order to
reduce the number of soldiers.
This process is done by first weeding out the "fearful and afraid"
(Shoftim 7:3) and then those who bow down upon their knees to drink water
(ibid. vv. 5-6), until only a small army is left:
And
the number of them that lapped, putting their hand to their mouth, were three
hundred men; but all the rest of the people bowed down upon their knees
to drink… and he sent all the rest of the people of Israel every man to his
tent, and retained those three hundred men. (Shoftim
7:6-8)
In the case of Shaul there is no explicit command to reduce the number of
fighters, but his army was also thinned out, with Scripture using a very similar
formulation as that used in connection with Gidon:
Shaul
chose him three thousand of Israel… and the rest of the people he sent every
man to his tent. (I Shmuel 13:2)
Later, Shaul's army was further reduced in size to numbers approaching
those of Gidon's army:
And
Shaul numbered the people that were present with him, about six hundred men.
(ibid. v. 15)
2)
In both cases, the war begins with the respective leader mustering his
troops in similar fashion:
But
the spirit of the Lord clothed Gidon, and he blew a shofar, and Aviezer
mustered behind him. (Shoftim 6:34)
And
Shaul blew the shofar throughout all the land saying, Let the Hebrews
hear. And all Israel heard say that Shaul had smitten the garrison of the
Pelishtim, and that Israel also had become odious to the Pelishtim. And the
people mustered after Shaul at Gilgal. (I Shmuel
13:3-4)
3)
In both wars, a description is given of Israel's fear, their running away
from the enemy and their hiding themselves in hideouts:
And
because of Midyan the children of Israel made for themselves the tunnels which
are in the mountains, and caves, and strongholds. (Shoftim
6:2)
When
the men of Israel saw that they were in straits, (for the people were
hard-pressed,) then the people hid themselves in caves, and in thickets, and in
rocks, and in strongholds, and in pits. (I Shmuel
13:6)
At this stage, however, the parallelism reaches a turning point. Until
now the parallelism focused on two individuals – Gidon and Shaul – and on the
two situations – the war against Midyan and the war against the Pelishtim.
Following these parallels, the story reaches Shaul's failure regarding the
sacrifices, which was dealt with at length in previous lessons. This failure
brings Shaul to adopt an entirely passive approach, and from now on he does not
parallel Gidon. On the contrary, there is a certain point regarding which the
contrast between the two figures stands out prominently: Whereas Gidon adopts
the military strategy of "And he divided the three hundred men into three
groups" (Shoftim 7:16), in the war against the Pelishtim, this very
same strategy is used against Shaul, in the aftermath of his sin: "And the
raiding parties came out of the camp of the Pelishtim in three groups" (I
Shmuel 13:17).
XIV. THE COMPARISON GIDON AND
YEHONATAN
The similarity between Shaul and Gidon in the war against Amon sharpens
the turning point in the war against the Pelishtim. To our great surprise, even
though the correspondence between Shaul and Gidon ceases in the wake of Shau's
sin, the parallel between the war against the Pelishtim and the war against
Midyan continues in full force – only that Shaul's place is seized from now on
by his son Yehonatan. The parallels between Yehonatan and Gidon arise at several
points:
1)
As we saw in the previous lesson, in contrast to Shaul who makes no use
of the means that stand at his disposal to inquire of God, Yehonatan succeeds –
even though he has no "official" way of doing so – in clarifying God's will by
way of a sign that he himself devises, and which he presents to his
lad:
Now
it came to pass one day,
that Yonatan the son of Shaul said to the boy that bore his armor, Come,
let us go over to the garrison of the Pelishtim… Then said Yehonatan, Behold, we
will pass over to these men, and we will reveal ourselves to them. If they say
thus to us, Tarry until we come to you, then we will stand still in our place,
and will not go up to them. But if they say to us, Come up to us, then we will
go up; for the Lord had delivered them into our hand: and this shall be a sign
to us. (I Shmuel 14:1-10)
This account is reminiscent of Gidon, who also goes down to the enemy
camp with his lad, and receives a sign from God:
And
it was on the same night
that the Lord said to him, Arise, go down to the camp; for I have delivered it
into your hand. But if you fear to go down, go you with Pura your boy
down to the camp, and you shall hear what they say; and afterwards shall
your hands be strengthened. (Shoftim 7:9-11)
2)
After receiving the sign by hearing what is said in the enemy camp, the
two respective leaders are confident in their victory:
And
it was, when Gidon heard the telling of the dream, and its interpretation, that
he bowed himself down to the ground, and returned to the camp of Israel and
said, Arise, for the Lord has delivered into your hand the host of
Midyan. (Shoftim 7:15)
And
the men of the garrison answered Yonatan and his armor-bearer, and said, Come up
to us, and we will show you something. And Yonatan said to his armor-bearer,
Come up after me: for the Lord has delivered them into the hand of
Israel. (I Shmuel 14:12)
3) The attacks made by Gidon and
Yehonatan lead to amazingly similar results:
And
the Lord set every man's sword against his fellow. (Shoftim
7:22)
And,
behold, every man's sword was against his fellow; and there was a very
great confusion. (I Shmuel 14:20)
It should be noted that these are the only two instances of this phrase
in Scripture.
3)
In both wars, the men of Mount Ephraim join in the pursuit after the
initial strike against the enemy:
And
Gidon sent messengers throughout all Mount Ephraim, saying, Come down
against Midyan, and seize before them the waters as far as Bet-Bara and the
Jordan. Then all the men of Ephraim were mustered, and took the waters as
far as Bet-Bara and the Jordan. (Shoftim 7:24)
Likewise
all the men of Israel who had hid themselves in Mount Ephraim,
when they heard that the Pelishtim fled, they also pursued them closely in the
battle. (I Shmuel 14:22)
4)
Toward the end of both wars, the people are faint and hungry:
And
Gidon came to the Jordan, and passed over, he, and the three hundred men that
were with him, faint, yet, pursuing them. And he said to the men of
Sukkot, Give, I pray you loaves of bread to the people that follow me;
for they are faint. (Shoftim 8:4-5)
For
Shaul had adjured the people, saying, Cursed be the man that eats any food until
evening, that I may be avenged on my enemies. So none of the people tasted any
food… And the people were faint… And the people were very
faint. (I Shmuel 14:24-31)
The significance of the correspondence is clear. As opposed to Shaul's
weakness, Yehonatan demonstrates courage, continuing in the path of Gidon until
the successful conclusion of the campaign. In the war against Midyan, God sends
a clear message. The number of fighters was intentionally reduced so that the
people should internalize the idea that it is God's war:
And
the Lord said to Gidon, The people that are with you are too many for me
to give Midyan into their hands; lest Israel vaunt themselves against me,
saying, my own hand has saved me. (Shoftim 7:2)
Yehonatan clearly expresses his acceptance of this principle before he
goes out with his lad to fight in the Pelishti camp:
It
may be that the Lord will perform a deed for us: for there is no restraint upon
the Lord to save by many or by few. (I Shmuel
14:6)
In contrast to Shaul's conduct throughout the campaign, Yehonatan's faith
in God leads him to victory. Scripture highlights the contrast between the two
figures by way of the changing parallel to Gidon.
It also stands to reason that it was not by chance that Scripture chose
the figure of Gidon to pass on the main messages of this story. Shaul, as the
first king, is made to stand a test of faith in God, in order, among other
reasons, to test his faith as king. For it was precisely this that concerned
Shmuel in his words of parting from the people:
And
Shmuel said to the people, Fear not: you have done all this wickedness. Yet turn
not aside from following the Lord, but serve the Lord with all your heart… Only
fear the Lord, and serve Him in truth with all your heart. For consider how
great are the things that He has done for you. (I Shmuel
12:20-24)
We have already noted in the past that this is the essence of Shaul's
failure at Gilgal: giving priority to human considerations over absolute faith
in God and the commitment to keep His word. In contrast to this failure stands
Gidon, who was the only shofet to whom it was proposed that he set up a
dynasty similar to a royal dynasty:
Then
the men of Israel said to Gidon, Rule you over us, both you, and your son, and
your son's son also; for you have delivered us from the hand of Midyan.
(Shoftim 8:22)
Gidon, however, refuses this offer:
And
Gidon said to them, I will not rule over you, neither shall my son rule over
you. (ibid. v. 23)
Gidon well understood the danger in the idea of the monarchy, and by
turning down Israel's seductive offer, he demonstrated his commitment to
strengthening Israel's faith in God. This was also the approach adopted by
Yehonatan the son of Shaul, who, in contrast to his father, based
his actions on his faith in God and His ability to deliver Israel "by many or by
few."
(Translated
by David Strauss)
|